Prominent Nigerian socio-political groups, including Afenifere and the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), have vehemently opposed the calls for the implementation of Sharia law in the South-West region. The controversial proposal has sparked debates across the region, with strong reactions from both Christian and Yoruba advocacy groups.
Afenifere, a prominent pan-Yoruba socio-political organization, described the push for Sharia in the region as a direct affront to the constitution of Nigeria, which recognizes the country as a secular state. According to Afenifere, the introduction of Sharia law in the South-West could divide the region along religious lines and erode the longstanding unity of the Yoruba people.
The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) also weighed in, warning that the establishment of Sharia law in non-northern regions could escalate religious intolerance and undermine the peaceful coexistence that has historically characterized the South-West. CAN emphasized that Nigeria’s diversity should be celebrated and that the country should remain secular to ensure justice for all citizens.
Other regional bodies and civil society organizations have joined the opposition, calling for an urgent national dialogue to address the divisive implications of introducing Sharia law outside its traditional northern strongholds. These groups argue that such a move would create unnecessary tensions and disrupt the social fabric of the South-West.
In response, proponents of Sharia law argue that it would provide a legal framework that aligns with Islamic principles, particularly for the Muslim population in the region. However, critics remain steadfast in their opposition, asserting that the legal and constitutional implications must be fully considered before any such law is introduced in the South-West.
